±Your Account
Membership:
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 5
Overall: 24166
Visitors: 45±Latest Webinar
±Latest Articles
· Geo-tagging & Photo Tracking On iOS
· KS – an open source bash script for indexing data
· Mobile Device Geotags & Armed Forces
· Categorization of embedded system forensic collection methodologies
· Interpretation of NTFS Timestamps
· What are ‘gdocs’? Google Drive Data – part 2
· What are ‘gdocs’? Google Drive Data
· Bad Sector Recovery
· Forensic Artifact: Malware Analysis in Windows 8
· Windows 8: Important Considerations for Computer Forensics and Electronic Discovery
· KS – an open source bash script for indexing data
· Mobile Device Geotags & Armed Forces
· Categorization of embedded system forensic collection methodologies
· Interpretation of NTFS Timestamps
· What are ‘gdocs’? Google Drive Data – part 2
· What are ‘gdocs’? Google Drive Data
· Bad Sector Recovery
· Forensic Artifact: Malware Analysis in Windows 8
· Windows 8: Important Considerations for Computer Forensics and Electronic Discovery
±Follow Us
±Latest Jobs
Back to top
Skip to content
Skip to menu
Back to top
Back to main
Skip to menu
Go to page Previous 1, 2

There are different problems with each, in my experience.
With JTAG/SPI/I2C, finding the test points is the hardest part. Minor headache is interpreting the resulting data dumps.
With chip-off the concern are untangling the "translation" layers and sometimes encryption of the dump, minor problem is getting the pin-out for unknown chips.
But, no disagreement with you or Bob.
By the way, I almost made it to your class in DE, Bob, but I think my boss just nixed it
JTAG & CHip offs
Re: JTAG & CHip offs
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 6:01 am
I would like to underline that the two things fall into two very different categories (IMHO).
The JTAG is essentially "software" and the "hardware side" of it is minimal, little less than being able to open the device is needed.
The chip-off is at the same time "hardware" AND "software", but the kind of experience/knowledge you need is more belonging to "hardware" (or at least this part is essential to avoid making a disaster).
What I mean is that if I had to hire two guys (with no specific experience with JTAG or chip-off) I would choose them preferably:
And yes I do know quite a few brilliant and experienced, capable electronic engineers, with a higher level of education, that simply don't know which side of a soldering iron is the handle
(and this DOES make a difference when it is on
).
jaclaz
_________________
- In theory there is no difference between theory and practice, but in practice there is. -
The JTAG is essentially "software" and the "hardware side" of it is minimal, little less than being able to open the device is needed.
The chip-off is at the same time "hardware" AND "software", but the kind of experience/knowledge you need is more belonging to "hardware" (or at least this part is essential to avoid making a disaster).
What I mean is that if I had to hire two guys (with no specific experience with JTAG or chip-off) I would choose them preferably:
- for the JTAG someone with previous programming experience
- for the chip-off someone with some previous experience as an electronics repairman
And yes I do know quite a few brilliant and experienced, capable electronic engineers, with a higher level of education, that simply don't know which side of a soldering iron is the handle
jaclaz
_________________
- In theory there is no difference between theory and practice, but in practice there is. -
-

jaclaz - Senior Member
Re: JTAG & CHip offs
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 5:17 pm
There are different problems with each, in my experience.
With JTAG/SPI/I2C, finding the test points is the hardest part. Minor headache is interpreting the resulting data dumps.
With chip-off the concern are untangling the "translation" layers and sometimes encryption of the dump, minor problem is getting the pin-out for unknown chips.
But, no disagreement with you or Bob.
By the way, I almost made it to your class in DE, Bob, but I think my boss just nixed it
-

jhup - Senior Member
Re: JTAG & CHip offs
Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 11:50 pm
So i can use a J-TAG box to take a dump of a locked phone and then use Xtract (XRY) to interpret the results and find out the code? what other useful things i can extract from the dump?
-
CopyRight - Senior Member
Re: JTAG & CHip offs
Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 12:03 am
You can recover deleted items as you will have a physical acquisition of the flash memory. Some tools like Cellebrite P.A. and XRY Complete will parse out the password, you can also use the CCL Forensics Python scripts to get them. Some of the JTAG tools will put the physical dump into a logical file system for you and you can export out the SQLite Databases for pretty much anything and recover data form call logs, text messages, contact, user data from applications, phone setting, gps and other location type data, and much much more..... (-: I sound like a commercial (-: As you have a physical dump, the items you can recover are endless. More so with Chipoff and it goes a bit deeper and the Pare Area is in place to allow Cellebrite P.A. and XRY Complete to rebuilt the logical file system on supported phones. Getting the deleted data form the physical dump can take some time, you need to use techniques to find the data and then decode it at the HEX Level to get date and time stamps, attributes, details (eg. incoming, outgoing, dialed, missed etc.) and other information related to the artifact you have found, again time consuming be very rewarding......
-

sideshow018 - Senior Member
















