±Forensic Focus Partners

Become an advertising partner

±Your Account


Forgotten password/username?

Site Members:

New Today: 2 Overall: 36779
New Yesterday: 2 Visitors: 122

±Follow Forensic Focus

Forensic Focus Facebook PageForensic Focus on TwitterForensic Focus LinkedIn GroupForensic Focus YouTube Channel

RSS feeds: News Forums Articles

±Latest Articles

±Latest Videos

±Latest Jobs

Govt-response-forensic-science - UK

Computer forensics discussion. Please ensure that your post is not better suited to one of the forums below (if it is, please post it there instead!)
Reply to topicReply to topic Printer Friendly Page
Forum FAQSearchView unanswered posts
Page Previous  1, 2 

Senior Member

Re: Govt-response-forensic-science - UK

Post Posted: Jul 13, 19 08:08

- Rich2005
I really wish they'd realise that being UKAS accredited doesn't demonstrate competence in any meaningful way.

And according to the Parliamentary document an organisation can have two chances to demonstrate being incompetent because organisations have two masters, not one! Oh no, that would be wrong and to be politically correct, one mistress and one master..

12. Having carefully considered responses from the public consultation, we consider granting the Regulator the power to issue compliance notices and prevent noncompliant providers from providing evidence to court to be sufficient. Further, the Regulator cannot be granted the power to rescind a provider’s accreditation as UKAS, rather than the Regulator, is the awarding body.

Institute for Digital Forensics (IDF) - www.linkedin.com/groups/2436720
Mobile Telephone Examination Board (MTEB) - www.linkedin.com/groups/141739
Universal Network Investigations - www.linkedin.com/groups/13536130
Mobile Telephone Evidence & Forensics trewmte.blogspot.com 

Page 2 of 2
Page Previous  1, 2