Join Us!

Notifications
Clear all

Belkasoft  

  RSS
Piter_
(@piter_)
New Member
Do you use Belkasoft? I use and have a few comments:
1. Problem with analyzing Firefox data when analyzing disk or disk image.
The process freezes or takes several days (!!) 2. Different numbers of artifacts found when: a) We analyze the original disk through a blocker. b) We analyze the disk image (RAW DD). c) We analyze the disk image mounted with an external program. Sources (a/b/c) have been verified by checksums and are the same. 3. Generally slow program operation compared to eg Axiom. Belkasoft
is supposed to make use of 32 threads but only for a certain stage
of the program's operation. In the final stage it uses barely a few % of the CPU. 4. Pornography detection is very slow. You can do it faster by manually
viewing the thumbnails.

And what are your experiences with Belkasoft?
This topic was modified 4 weeks ago by Piter_
Quote
Posted : 10/07/2020 6:59 pm
passcodeunlock
(@passcodeunlock)
Senior Member

1. It's fast enough, not better or worse then any other click-forensics tool.

2. No issues from different formats of the same device, you must be doing something wrong, a device over write blocker and it's raw image gives the same results on the test.

3. Detecting pr0n is a feature based on Anaconda2, it is as slow or fast as the external module is.

4. Is it perfect ?! No, it is not, there is always room for better!

Over all, it is great, it speeds up my work. Compared to the average user, I use Belkasoft Evidence Center with well defined purposes to ease up my work, not trying to use it for the whole data triage. Among the others, it is a very good tool!

ReplyQuote
Posted : 13/07/2020 8:25 pm
Piter_
(@piter_)
New Member
Thanks for comment, but: 

1. If you consider a few days of analysis from the Firefox browser as "fast enough", congratulations on your sense of humor.

2. This is not true. Technical support responded that they knew the problem and were working to resolve it. However, they do not know when it will happen 🙁

3. I'm not interested in what module deals with it. It happens very slowly. Axiom uses all threads and is much faster. So you can do it better!

4. Belkasfot is weak in my opinion. The only plus is the low price.

Added to this is the lack of "remove duplicates" option. It is used by Axiom, UFED, XRY but at Belkasoft they do not understand the need for its existence and have no idea how to implement it - I received this answer from technical support.

 

Apparently the whole world uses Belkasoft and nobody else comments? 🙂

ReplyQuote
Posted : 14/07/2020 4:53 pm
Share: