Article about ISO standards and computer forensics

Is it actually a standard or is it WD as mentioned here?
http//www.iso27001security.com/html/27037.html

JFYI, and as a general opinion, I think that standards should ALL be publicly available, the scope of them being that of certifying something to "protect" the procedure and the parts involved.

jaclaz

As far as I know, the ISO 27037 is still a draft, but my laboratory already use this standard for two years.
According to me the ISO 27037 isn't comprehensive about the mobile devices and it must be contextualize in the italian legislative body.

So, sorry if I seem picky, mainly because I am picky wink

• there is NO such standard
• there is a draft of it
• your laboratory adopted since two years this draft that however needs to be "contextualized" to local Laws

With all due respect for you and your laboratory, the above equates to

my laboratory uses its own internal procedures, loosely based on a two years old draft of a yet to be approved standard, modified in order to be coherent with Italian Law

which is of course a good thing ) , but unless proven wrong, to me a "to be contextualized draft of a standard" is really a NON-standard.

As you might well know, there is a nice saying among technical engineers

I love standards, there are so many of them… 8)

Throwing on the table drafts too, might be a little premature….

jaclaz

First of all I'm sorry for my broken english 😉 , but I believe that is necessary regard this draft of standard because the activity of preservation is the first step to consider from which depends the result of a long series of activities that compose a digital investigation.

Hi,

I hve been trying to get a copy of the draft ISO 27037 for soemtime. I have read the hardcopy & need a softcopy - can anyone assist?

Thanks & Regards,