I love crypto, post-quantum crypto. You, may not. But its easier than you think, I give you a hand. Just look into Aurora Transparent Succinct Argument for R1CS. Succinct means short and compact. R1CS stands for Rank-1 Constraint Satisfaction.
Confused? SNARG Succinct Non-interactive ARGument.
Put all together and you get SNARG for R1CS.
Last piece for your mind Its about zero knowledge.
Ok, School is off - have a nice day.
I love crypto, post-quantum crypto. You, may not. But its easier than you think, I give you a hand. Just look into Aurora Transparent Succinct Argument for R1CS. Succinct means short and compact. R1CS stands for Rank-1 Constraint Satisfaction.
Confused? SNARG Succinct Non-interactive ARGument.
Put all together and you get SNARG for R1CS.
Last piece for your mind Its about zero knowledge.
Ok, School is off - have a nice day.
Good. )
If this is a day's lesson, by 2128 I will be familiar with the topic and be able to take the SNARG - R1CS certification exam.
JFYI, I already took (and passed) the zero knowledge one, now it is official that I have zero knowledge on QC (Quantum Crypto)
Keep up the good work.
jaclaz
The concept of Zero Knowledge Proof ZKP is worth learning. Mapping into human reality a challenge. Think about a eHandshakeing and trust finding or building.
E.g. here on FF I trust nobody as long as no biometric WebAuthn is in use.
E.g. here on FF I trust nobody as long as no biometric WebAuthn is in use.
I guess this makes for a nice, symmetrical situation ) , as I don't believe many people on FF trust you roll .
jaclaz
Speaking for others only disclosures your professionality.
Speaking for others only disclosures your professionality.
I am not at all speaking for others, I am expressing my opinion and belief.
Symmetrical situations are anyway nicer IMHO
http//
jaclaz
Matt Green has a very good primer for ZKP Zero Knowledge Proof online