Notifications
Clear all

FAPSA

4 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
526 Views
(@trewmte)
Noble Member
Joined: 19 years ago
Posts: 1877
Topic starter  

Decisions are to be made about the future of mobile, digital and computer evidential collection, forensic examination and acquired evidence, standards etc.

Interesting to read the Forensic and Policing Services Association (FAPSA) also believe in high standards for public sector and private organisation and individuals involved in forensics.

FAPSA response to the Forensic Science Regulator (FSR)
http//www.fapsa.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Forensic-regultaor-response-FAPSA.pdf


   
Quote
jaclaz
(@jaclaz)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 18 years ago
Posts: 5133
 

FAPSA response to the Forensic Science Regulator (FSR)

In a nutshell "flat agreement" on ALL points with only some very feeble diverging on ISO qualifications (and no explicit mention of the "absurd" - IMHO - ISO 17025)
http//www.forensicfocus.com/Forums/viewtopic/t=8680/

jaclaz


   
ReplyQuote
(@trewmte)
Noble Member
Joined: 19 years ago
Posts: 1877
Topic starter  

FAPSA response to the Forensic Science Regulator (FSR)

In a nutshell "flat agreement" on ALL points with only some very feeble diverging on ISO qualifications (and no explicit mention of the "absurd" - IMHO - ISO 17025)
http//www.forensicfocus.com/Forums/viewtopic/t=8680/

jaclaz

Very true jaclaz. The impact of ISO17025 is mentioned at the Peter Sommer link mentioned http//trewmte.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/fsr-positioning-for-statutory-powers.html


   
ReplyQuote
jaclaz
(@jaclaz)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 18 years ago
Posts: 5133
 

Very true jaclaz. The impact of ISO17025 is mentioned at the Peter Sommer link mentioned http//trewmte.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/fsr-positioning-for-statutory-powers.html

Good to know that an University professor thinks very like me on the specific subject. )

Maybe it is good to remind what I believe the generic definition of (technical) norm is (or should be)
A set of rules or compulsory behaviours that betters current level of *something* (like security, safety, health, reliability, etc.) in the specific field at a reasonable cost for society.

The point here is whether these regulations will actually better *anything* in the field AND if the relative costs are "reasonable" (the cost is not only "money", but also "time needed").

I already personally see the "plainer" ISO9001 (which is/was meant for industrial processes) to have been "forced" upon many professions/trades that are inherently not "industrial" but rather "artisan" (or even "artistic") work, the much more restrictive ISO17025 cannot IMHO be fully applied to digital forensics, and - still IMHO - there is the concrete risk that in order to have it applied to a certain extent, the effect will be to slow down (or even stop) the development of "independent" or "new" tools/methods/approaches.

In industry processes tend to be both widely tested and "mature" (at the time they actually enter into the industrial manufacturing/production), digital forensics is neededly, and more so in these times of quick technological evolution/changes, to be much nearer to "research" and/or "experimentation".

jaclaz


   
ReplyQuote
Share: