I charge £850.00 for a two-days course which is equal to the revenue earned from two to three handset/SIM examinations.
As you know I also charge for the Diplomas
http//www.forensicfocus.com/index.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&p=6540951
I do have five different one-day courses for beginners and university students at £57.75 per course.
1) FORENSICS & MOBILE / SMART / WIRELESS MARKETPLACE©
2) Getting started with SIM/USIM Examaination
3) Getting started with Handset Examaination
4) Getting started with Cell Site Analysis
5) Getting started with Call Record Analysis
Don't you already have one? )
Oleg, see you in May
1. Nope, UFED overpriced a lot. Frankly speaking, after hearing your promotions about "the most advanced and most invested blah-blah-blah" I planned to buy one for our Forensic Lab (this is my 2nd business) in Moscow, but after trying Physical Pro I understood that I simply don't need it, since OFS + XRY do much better and, moreover, save money.
2. Really? Do you come to Moscow in May? 😉
1. Nope, UFED overpriced a lot. Frankly speaking, after hearing your promotions about "the most advanced and most invested blah-blah-blah" I planned to buy one for our Forensic Lab (this is my 2nd business) in Moscow, but after trying Physical Pro I understood that I simply don't need it, since OFS + XRY do much better and, moreover, save money.
Coming from a competitor I would not expect anything else.
I bet you didn't see the extent of the latest v2.0 release
http//
2. Really? Do you come to Moscow in May? 😉
I ment June at MFC11
http//
1. Nope, UFED overpriced a lot. Frankly speaking, after hearing your promotions about "the most advanced and most invested blah-blah-blah" I planned to buy one for our Forensic Lab (this is my 2nd business) in Moscow, but after trying Physical Pro I understood that I simply don't need it, since OFS + XRY do much better and, moreover, save money.
Coming from a competitor I would not expect anything else.
I bet you didn't see the extent of the latest v2.0 release
http//www.cellebrite.com/images/stories/release-notes/release%20note-march-2-ROW-s.pdf
wink Keep the pace.
By the way, XRY is also a competing product for us. But, unlike you, guys from MSAB don't shout insignificant words about "most advanced and most invested". They set a reasonable price for their products and just do their job. And do it well.
Frankly speaking, Ron, I think it's at least unfair - to declare your tool as the "most advanced" while it can extract siginifcantly less data than others. Yes, UFED supports the huge number of devices. But I (as forensic expert) don't care how many phones are supported, I just need to extract all possible information from those specific devices I have for examination.
But… I think it's enough. I'm stopping this discussion from my side, since it may be not so interesting for other forum members.
Please accept my apologies is you think some of my words were offensive, but I've really spoken as an examiner, not as your competitor. And I just shared my personal opinion about price/quality rate of your tool.
So good luck -)
I ment June at MFC11
http//www.mobileforensicsconference.com/
And see you at MFC. I hope you will have a minute to demonstrate UFED 2.0 to me, so I'll change my mind and purchase it for my forensic lab in Moscow -)
You politely continue to ignore UFED Physical which is the subject of this thread.
I agree that we should stop here and let the users judge the value of gaining physical image of a phone and get access to deleted data, something that UFED does best with more than 1100 different models supported and many more on the way (including iPhone physical, Android physical, Windows Phone 7 and others).
Let the best tool lead.
Talking about 'claims' I noticed from RonS link
There is the wording
TheTrainingCo., producers of the Techno Forensics and Techno Security & Digital Investigations conferences has announced the acquisition of Mobile Forensics World, the Worlds Only Mobile Forensics Conference
"the Worlds Only Mobile Forensics Conference" Is that true?