@jaclaz I won't post informations about a case here, I sent you a PM.
Which is fine ) though it is not like you actually sent any "sensible" informations via PM, since the data extraction was done by someone else, how it was done remains an open question.
jaclaz
@jaclaz I won't post informations about a case here, I sent you a PM.
Which is fine ) though it is not like you actually sent any "sensible" informations via PM, since the data extraction was done by someone else, how it was done remains an open question.
jaclaz
I hate this kind of thing on FF. I totally get the need to avoid giving any information that can link to specific cases, organisations and so on, but really good practitioners share new techniques or developments - and I can think of several that do, to the enormous benefit of the community. Otherwise it's just willy waving along the lines of 'I can get into that, easy' but never any actual proof.
I sent in PM the name of the company who did the report for my analysis. Writing such names here would be considered hidden advertising.
I didn't write any sensitive informations about the hardware not even in the PM, that wouldn't be very professional either…
I never wrote that I created the technical report of the disk, I did the analysis for the court.
The OP was hijacked with mostly useless comments on specific samples, which lead nowhere. Let's just drop dead the whole thing.
@redcat the link you provided is dead )
@redcat the link you provided is dead )
For some strange reasons the board software "wants" an ending slash
http//www.forensicfocus.com/Forums/viewtopic/p=6585902/
jaclaz