Tom Tom GPS forensi...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Tom Tom GPS forensics under Linux

6 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
506 Views
(@philip)
New Member
Joined: 13 years ago
Posts: 3
Topic starter  

Hi.

I have a question about TomTom GPS forensics under Linux. I have been reading Tom Tom forensics by Clara Maria Columbini.
This is the command used when doing hash of the data on the original device (Tom Tom).

# dd if=/dev/hda1 | md5sum

The original device is called /dev/hda1.

This is the command used when doing the forensic image of Tom Tom data.

# dd if=/dev/sdb1 of=/media/hdb4/tomtom01.img

Now the name of the original device is /dev/sdb1. Why did the name of data on the original device change from hda1 to sdb1? Is it the SD card?

Is the data on the GPS device write protected or is it deleted if the if and of parameters switch in the second dd command (making the forensic image command)?

Thank you for your help.


   
Quote
 RonS
(@rons)
Reputable Member
Joined: 17 years ago
Posts: 358
 

Philip,

Once you manage to perform an extraction, please read this thread about data that is available on TomTom devices that is not generally accessible. These an encrypted trip-log files in the STATDATA root folder, that once decrypted have 5 second time stamp resolution of the TomTom trips.

See this link for sample decrypted such triplog files
http//www.forensicfocus.com/Forums/viewtopic/t=8456/

Many Cellebrite UFED users have already used that free service to decrypt these files.

Ron


   
ReplyQuote
(@philip)
New Member
Joined: 13 years ago
Posts: 3
Topic starter  

I appreciate the answer RonS ) .


   
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 6593)
Guest
Joined: 17 years ago
Posts: 1158
 

Now the name of the original device is /dev/sdb1. Why did the name of data on the original device change from hda1 to sdb1? Is it the SD card?

They are two different Linux devices/subdevices. Which is which … well, you should be able to get that information from dmesg. Try 'dmesg | grep sdb'.

hda1 and sdb1 are not necessarily the devices names to use in *your* particular case.

Is the data on the GPS device write protected or is it deleted if the if and of parameters switch in the second dd command (making the forensic image command)?

'if' should refer to the device you are imaging. 'of' should refer to the device you are storing the image on, and typically it's a file on a mounted device,

There's no 'write protection' anywhere here – unless you're using a write blocker. It's up to you (or the particular Linux distrubution you are using) to fix that.

If you point 'of' to the device you should be imaging, you're more than likely to destroy the contents of it. dd doesn't care if it's a raw device or a file on a mounted device.


   
ReplyQuote
(@philip)
New Member
Joined: 13 years ago
Posts: 3
Topic starter  

Thank you for the answer athulin.

The device mentioned is not in my posession.
It was described in an article writen by Clara Maria Columbini.
Are there other ways of finding out why is the original device given two different names?


   
ReplyQuote
(@alastairfay)
Eminent Member
Joined: 14 years ago
Posts: 36
 

hda = IDE drives (hard disk)

sda = SCSI drives…. and SATA drives too. (SCSI disk)

That's my understanding of the differences anyway.


   
ReplyQuote
Share: