You may not recover...
 
Notifications
Clear all

You may not recover missing sectors

5 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
656 Views
jhup
 jhup
(@jhup)
Noble Member
Joined: 16 years ago
Posts: 1442
Topic starter  

. . . is that what this can come to?

In a foreign bribery case in Washington, D.C., the criminal defense lawyers for a man charged in an undercover sting don't think federal prosecutors should get any benefit at trial in enhancing the audio or using subtitles to help jurors understand what people are saying on the tapes.

Can this have a "trickle" effect into other "enhanced" areas? How about recovered images where chunks are missing? Can someone infer what kind of image that may have been? Partial logs?


   
Quote
(@pragmatopian)
Estimable Member
Joined: 16 years ago
Posts: 154
 

I think the point at issue here is whether the prosecution's enhanced version presents the information as being clearer than what the defendant actually heard in the original environment where the recording was made.

That's not really the case with partial fragments from a disk they tend to be presented 'as is' rather than in an enhanced form.


   
ReplyQuote
jhup
 jhup
(@jhup)
Noble Member
Joined: 16 years ago
Posts: 1442
Topic starter  

I beg to differ, specifically in cases where recovered file is a video, audio or image file, and a reconstruction or "enhancement" is often attempted.

One may claim they only saw/heard the "broken" material, not the enhanced one.

I think the point at issue here is whether the prosecution's enhanced version presents the information as being clearer than what the defendant actually heard in the original environment where the recording was made.

That's not really the case with partial fragments from a disk they tend to be presented 'as is' rather than in an enhanced form.


   
ReplyQuote
(@armresl)
Noble Member
Joined: 21 years ago
Posts: 1011
 

The cases I've worked at the Judge wants to know what was done to the tape for enhancement.

If you explain you do a normalization, then drop out frequency (insert number) then a 5db gain on section 305 of the tape, usually they are good with that.

Really it parallels CF work. If you are competent in what you do, confident in the skills you possess and can articulate that to others, they tend to share your confidence.

What a Judge doesn't want is you telling then what to hear, you cant start a tape and say see where he says (this) you play it for them a few times (usually looped) and then if you are asked what you heard then you say and you may have people who think along the same lines as you do. Sometimes an enhancement is not as good as a slow. You can slow things down to the syllable and you can clearly make out that a word is not the word they think they heard.


   
ReplyQuote
lucpel
(@lucpel)
Trusted Member
Joined: 14 years ago
Posts: 55
 

Enhacing audio can be crucial. There are few to tricks to apply to improve audio quality for voice and speech recognition. 1) Identify the predominant resonant freq of the speech & apply a resonant filter in that range.
2) Cut unnecessary freqs with a Band pass filter.
3) Boost the audio file(or increment the gain).
4) In extreme situations, try an FFT analysis, and reconstruct the partials as you need. It is also good to use phonetic software to get && analyze the formants of the speech, specially to understand obscure passages.


   
ReplyQuote
Share: