Nuix Appoints Mark McCluskie As EMEA Head Of Investigations

Global technology company Nuix today named Mark McCluskie as its Head of Investigations, EMEA. McCluskie joins Nuix from a long career in law-enforcement where his experience includes digital forensics and cybercrime. In his new role, McCluskie will work with Nuix’s digital forensic investigation team, key customers and the broader marketplace to provide insight on its products and direction in the large scale investigative sector.Global technology company Nuix today named Mark McCluskie as its Head of Investigations, EMEA. McCluskie joins Nuix from a long career in law-enforcement where his experience includes digital forensics and cybercrime. In his new role, McCluskie will work with Nuix’s digital forensic investigation team, key customers and the broader marketplace to provide insight on its products and direction in the large scale investigative sector.

“Mark brings a vast amount of investigative knowledge to Nuix. I’m delighted to have someone with his level of law-enforcement experience join the team and expand our growing digital forensic investigations offering.” said Paul Slater, Global Head of Investigations at Nuix. “Mark is perfectly placed to offer first-hand experience to our law-enforcement and investigative customers, helping them to deal with the growing struggle of big data in investigations.

McCluskie will support many of Nuix’s activities around law enforcement and policing acting as an experienced point of contact for investigators. Government agencies and Police forces are experiencing an exponential rise in cybercrime and with McCluskie’s experience; Nuix will be able to address increasing demand for digital forensics tools in local, national and international law-enforcement. He will also act as a conduit back to Nuix’s development team to advise on product direction and the continued development of Nuix Investigation & Response.

McCluskie recently left a long law enforcement career, in the Royal Ulster Constabulary GC and Police Service of Northern Ireland, with the last 25 of those years being spent in various technical areas of policing. His last 13 years have encompassed Digital Forensics and Cyber Crime, where as a Hi-Tech manager and Detective Inspector, he had responsibility for technical examinations and large-scale cyber investigations. He was involved in digital aspects of National Security, working in the fight against local, national and international terrorism and was a lead investigator in many recent high-profile UK cyber-attacks.

Get The Latest DFIR News!

Top DFIR articles in your inbox every month.


Unsubscribe any time. We respect your privacy - read our privacy policy.

“The amount of big data that we are producing every day, presents a growing problem for investigative bodies and law enforcement agencies. The variety and sheer volume of data that must be analyzed, requires a deep expertise and specific tools to manage effectively” said McCluskie. “I look forward to working with Nuix to transform the way organisations approach investigations, now, and in the future.”

Leave a Comment

Latest Videos

Quantifying Data Volatility for IoT Forensics With Examples From Contiki OS

Forensic Focus 22nd June 2022 5:00 am

File timestamps are used by forensics practitioners as a fundamental artifact. For example, the creation of user files can show traces of user activity, while system files, like configuration and log files, typically reveal when a program was run. 

Despite timestamps being ubiquitous, the understanding of their exact meaning is mostly overlooked in favor of fully-automated, correlation-based approaches. Existing work for practitioners aims at understanding Windows and is not directly applicable to Unix-like systems. 

In this paper, we review how each layer of the software stack (kernel, file system, libraries, application) influences MACB timestamps on Unix systems such as Linux, OpenBSD, FreeBSD and macOS.

We examine how POSIX specifies the timestamp behavior and propose a framework for automatically profiling OS kernels, user mode libraries and applications, including compliance checks against POSIX.

Our implementation covers four different operating systems, the GIO and Qt library, as well as several user mode applications and is released as open-source.

Based on 187 compliance tests and automated profiling covering common file operations, we found multiple unexpected and non-compliant behaviors, both on common operations and in edge cases.

Furthermore, we provide tables summarizing timestamp behavior aimed to be used by practitioners as a quick-reference.

Learn more: https://dfrws.org/presentation/a-systematic-approach-to-understanding-macb-timestamps-on-unixlike-systems/

File timestamps are used by forensics practitioners as a fundamental artifact. For example, the creation of user files can show traces of user activity, while system files, like configuration and log files, typically reveal when a program was run.

Despite timestamps being ubiquitous, the understanding of their exact meaning is mostly overlooked in favor of fully-automated, correlation-based approaches. Existing work for practitioners aims at understanding Windows and is not directly applicable to Unix-like systems.

In this paper, we review how each layer of the software stack (kernel, file system, libraries, application) influences MACB timestamps on Unix systems such as Linux, OpenBSD, FreeBSD and macOS.

We examine how POSIX specifies the timestamp behavior and propose a framework for automatically profiling OS kernels, user mode libraries and applications, including compliance checks against POSIX.

Our implementation covers four different operating systems, the GIO and Qt library, as well as several user mode applications and is released as open-source.

Based on 187 compliance tests and automated profiling covering common file operations, we found multiple unexpected and non-compliant behaviors, both on common operations and in edge cases.

Furthermore, we provide tables summarizing timestamp behavior aimed to be used by practitioners as a quick-reference.

Learn more: https://dfrws.org/presentation/a-systematic-approach-to-understanding-macb-timestamps-on-unixlike-systems/

YouTube Video UCQajlJPesqmyWJDN52AZI4Q_i0zd7HtluzY

A Systematic Approach to Understanding MACB Timestamps on Unixlike Systems

Forensic Focus 21st June 2022 5:00 am

This error message is only visible to WordPress admins

Important: No API Key Entered.

Many features are not available without adding an API Key. Please go to the YouTube Feed settings page to add an API key after following these instructions.

Latest Articles

Share to...