DMU Forensic Computing For Practitioners MSc Courses

The Service Police Cyber Crime Centre based at Southwick Park near Portsmouth are in the process of organising with De Montfort University, Professor Brian Jenkinson and Professor Tony Sammes to host the courses detailed below:

Foundations of Forensic Computing – 27 Feb 12 – 9 Mar 12
Forensic Examination of Internet Use – 28 May 12 – 1 Jun 12
Binary Analysis of Microsoft Documents – 11 Jun 12 – 15 Jun 12
Forensic Examinations of Network Computers – 23 Jul 12 – 27 Jul 12
Advanced Topics in Forensic Computing – 6 Aug 12 – 10 Aug 12

Further details below…These courses will all be delivered by Professors Jenkinson and Sammes at Southwick Park and will all be accredited by De Montfort University meaning they can be taken as either short courses or as modules towards the MSc being offered by that academic institution. THE COURSES DO THUS CARRY THE FULL DE MONTFORT QUALIFICATION AND CONTENT IS IDENTICAL TO THOSE TAUGHT AT DMU.

The courses are for those employed in Law Enforcement or the Ministry of Defence involved in the forensic analysis of digital media.

Get The Latest DFIR News!

Top DFIR articles in your inbox every month.


Unsubscribe any time. We respect your privacy - read our privacy policy.

The RMP are providing the classroom, hardware, software and admin support required which has kept the overheads to a minimum. THIS RESULTS IN THE COSTS OF THE COURSES BEING PROVIDED AT A CONSIDERABLE DISCOUNT TO STUDENTS. IT IS LIKELY THAT , PROVIDING ENOUGH STUDENTS ATTEND, THE ACTUAL COST WILL BE ABOUT HALF OF THE COST OF SIMILAR COURSES AVAILABLE ELSEWHERE. THERE IS ALSO THE LIKELIHOOD THAT SAVINGS CAN BE MADE FOR ACCOMODATION (LOCAL B&B’s OR MESS ACCOMMODATION) AND CAR PARKING IS AVAILABLE FOR STUDENTS WISHING TO TRAVEL DAILY TO THE VENUE (JUST OFF THE M27).

IT MUST BE EMPHASISED THAT THE SPECIAL ARRANGEMENT FOR THESE CUT-PRICE COURSES WITH DMU AND THE TWO PROFESSORS IS FOR THE YEAR 2012 ONLY, IT IS NOT LIKELY TO BE REPEATED. ALLOCATION WILL BE ON A FIRST-COME, FIRST SERVED BASIS AS PLACES ARE STRICTLY LIMITED.

For further details please contact Rob Lyness ([email protected]mod.uk/[email protected]) on 02392 285236 / 07704 112572 or Jim Priddin ([email protected]) on 02392 285231

Leave a Comment

Latest Videos

Quantifying Data Volatility for IoT Forensics With Examples From Contiki OS

Forensic Focus 22nd June 2022 5:00 am

File timestamps are used by forensics practitioners as a fundamental artifact. For example, the creation of user files can show traces of user activity, while system files, like configuration and log files, typically reveal when a program was run. 

Despite timestamps being ubiquitous, the understanding of their exact meaning is mostly overlooked in favor of fully-automated, correlation-based approaches. Existing work for practitioners aims at understanding Windows and is not directly applicable to Unix-like systems. 

In this paper, we review how each layer of the software stack (kernel, file system, libraries, application) influences MACB timestamps on Unix systems such as Linux, OpenBSD, FreeBSD and macOS.

We examine how POSIX specifies the timestamp behavior and propose a framework for automatically profiling OS kernels, user mode libraries and applications, including compliance checks against POSIX.

Our implementation covers four different operating systems, the GIO and Qt library, as well as several user mode applications and is released as open-source.

Based on 187 compliance tests and automated profiling covering common file operations, we found multiple unexpected and non-compliant behaviors, both on common operations and in edge cases.

Furthermore, we provide tables summarizing timestamp behavior aimed to be used by practitioners as a quick-reference.

Learn more: https://dfrws.org/presentation/a-systematic-approach-to-understanding-macb-timestamps-on-unixlike-systems/

File timestamps are used by forensics practitioners as a fundamental artifact. For example, the creation of user files can show traces of user activity, while system files, like configuration and log files, typically reveal when a program was run.

Despite timestamps being ubiquitous, the understanding of their exact meaning is mostly overlooked in favor of fully-automated, correlation-based approaches. Existing work for practitioners aims at understanding Windows and is not directly applicable to Unix-like systems.

In this paper, we review how each layer of the software stack (kernel, file system, libraries, application) influences MACB timestamps on Unix systems such as Linux, OpenBSD, FreeBSD and macOS.

We examine how POSIX specifies the timestamp behavior and propose a framework for automatically profiling OS kernels, user mode libraries and applications, including compliance checks against POSIX.

Our implementation covers four different operating systems, the GIO and Qt library, as well as several user mode applications and is released as open-source.

Based on 187 compliance tests and automated profiling covering common file operations, we found multiple unexpected and non-compliant behaviors, both on common operations and in edge cases.

Furthermore, we provide tables summarizing timestamp behavior aimed to be used by practitioners as a quick-reference.

Learn more: https://dfrws.org/presentation/a-systematic-approach-to-understanding-macb-timestamps-on-unixlike-systems/

YouTube Video UCQajlJPesqmyWJDN52AZI4Q_i0zd7HtluzY

A Systematic Approach to Understanding MACB Timestamps on Unixlike Systems

Forensic Focus 21st June 2022 5:00 am

This error message is only visible to WordPress admins

Important: No API Key Entered.

Many features are not available without adding an API Key. Please go to the YouTube Feed settings page to add an API key after following these instructions.

Latest Articles

Share to...