by Paul Gullon-Scott BSc MA MSc MSc FMBPSS
Following on from my introduction to digital forensics mental health stressors, this article aims to provide a more in-depth examination of two specific operational stressors discussed previously: burnout and the need for enhanced organisational support.
Digital forensic investigators carry out critical work in the fight against online child exploitation by identifying, cataloguing, and investigating harmful digital content. While their role is vital, the nature of their work exposes them to graphic and distressing materials daily. Combined with long hours and limited mental health support, this exposure places them at risk of psychological distress, compassion fatigue, and even burnout. This article explores how prolonged hours and insufficient mental health resources affect digital forensic investigators, emphasising the urgent need for supportive interventions that can safeguard their mental wellbeing.
Long Working Hours and Burnout
In digital forensics, extended and irregular working hours are commonplace due to high caseloads and the necessity for meticulous analysis. Investigators routinely sort through vast digital content, classifying and preparing evidence for legal proceedings. This workload, compounded by limited resources and time limits imposed by the criminal justice system, pushes many to work long hours, leading to physical and emotional exhaustion.
Burnout among digital forensic investigators, often described as a state of overwhelming fatigue and emotional depletion, is unfortunately prevalent. Many experience reduced motivation and difficulty remaining engaged due to constant exposure to disturbing materials. The backlog experienced by many digital forensic units exacerbates these issues, with investigators feeling a profound responsibility to keep up, despite limited support and not enough staff. This is often compounded by comments from supervisors and senior managers about not enough work being processed.
The impact of burnout is significant, as it can reduce job satisfaction and impair cognitive function. Research has shown that the cumulative stress of high caseloads and constant exposure can lead to what is known as “chronic workplace stress,” where investigators struggle to switch off mentally, even when not at work.
Burnout also arises from technological challenges, such as outdated tools that slow down the investigative process, requiring investigators to spend additional hours meeting evidentiary standards. This is often compounded by multiple updates to software, each of which must be validated – a requirement of ISO 17025 – before being applied. This can result in significant delays, increased workloads, and frustration among forensic investigators. These delays can hinder case progress, strain resources, and exacerbate the already high levels of stress and fatigue experienced by investigators.
As the field advances, so does the demand for specialised technical skills, which often requires investigators to train and learn on their own time, fostering a continuous work mentality that detracts from recovery.
Emotional Detachment and Compassion Fatigue
Burnout in digital forensic investigators is closely linked to compassion fatigue, a form of emotional exhaustion from prolonged exposure to traumatic content. This “cost of caring” can result in a kind of emotional numbness, where investigators may struggle to connect with others or even experience empathy. Prolonged detachment often manifests as cynicism and emotional withdrawal, contributing to feelings of isolation from peers and work.
The impact of compassion fatigue on investigators’ mental health is profound. It disrupts their ability to remain emotionally present, both in their professional and personal lives. This coping mechanism, though protective initially, can lead to more serious long-term harm, affecting their personal relationships and potentially reducing their resilience to future stress. Many digital forensic investigators find it increasingly challenging to disconnect from the difficult material they encounter, leading to a state of permanent vigilance and anxiety.
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
Digital forensic investigators are also at high risk of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), also referred to as secondary traumatic stress (STS), commonly known as vicarious trauma. This type of trauma occurs when exposure to distressing content evokes symptoms such as nightmares or intrusive thoughts. For many, PTSD develops gradually over time, as investigators are exposed to graphic material on a daily basis, without adequate recovery periods or mental health support, often going unnoticed until it significantly impacts their well-being.
In addition to emotional detachment, many investigators use coping mechanisms such as compartmentalisation, which can further isolate them emotionally from colleagues and family. Though these methods may help them perform their duties in the short term, they ultimately perpetuate a cycle of trauma that is hard to break. Moreover, investigators with personal trauma histories may be more vulnerable to PTSD, highlighting the need for proactive mental health support.
Insufficient Mental Health Support Systems
Despite the widely acknowledged psychological risks, many organisations fail to provide adequate mental health support for digital forensic investigators. Those working in sensitive investigative roles report a lack of trust in organisational support, perceiving the resources offered as either superficial or stigmatized. In many instances, the available support consists of annual wellness checks or limited counselling, both of which are often insufficient to address the daily trauma these individuals face.
Practical barriers, such as understaffing and the prioritisation of case throughput, frequently prevent investigators from accessing mental health support even when it is offered. Moreover, the stigma surrounding mental health issues discourages many from seeking help, as they fear it may compromise their position or reflect poorly on their ability to handle the job. Enhanced mental health resources, including structured psychological surveillance, resilience training, and regular debriefing sessions, would provide investigators with essential coping tools and a sense of organisational care and trust.
Organisational Culture and Stigma Surrounding Mental Health Support
The culture within policing in general and forensic organisations often places a high value on resilience and endurance, inadvertently creating a stigma around seeking mental health support. Many investigators feel pressured to demonstrate toughness, believing that seeking help may be seen as a sign of weakness. This belief fosters a culture where stress is internalised rather than addressed, leading to untreated psychological issues that can escalate over time. This can result in decreased job performance and higher rates of absenteeism and staff turnover. It can also have personal consequences for investigators, such as strained relationships and a diminished quality of life. The lack of open dialogue and support regarding mental health further perpetuates the cycle, making it increasingly difficult for individuals to seek help when needed.
Supportive organisational culture is key to reducing this stigma. Training supervisors to recognise signs of distress and fostering open dialogue around mental health can create a more supportive work environment. Peer support initiatives and supervisor-led mental health programs have shown promise in breaking down these barriers, encouraging investigators to seek help without fear of judgment. Normalising mental health discussions and creating a safe space for support-seeking are essential steps toward sustaining the mental wellbeing of digital forensic investigators.
Initiatives such as the supervisor well-being course offered by Oscar Kilo in November 2024 should be mandated for supervisors and above to ensure that leaders are equipped with the necessary skills and knowledge to support the mental health and wellbeing of their teams. By making such training compulsory, organisations can foster a culture of awareness, reduce stigma surrounding mental health, and empower supervisors to identify signs of stress or burnout early, providing timely support and interventions. This proactive approach not only enhances the wellbeing of staff but also improves overall organisational performance and resilience. More information for this course can be found here.
Recommendations for Enhanced Mental Health Support
To address these challenges, organisations must adopt a multifaceted approach that addresses both individual needs and organisational culture. Regular psychological screenings tailored to the demands of digital forensic work, as well as resilience training, can help prevent burnout and compassion fatigue. Access to trained mental health professionals who are familiar with the demands of forensic work is critical for effective intervention and support.
Additionally, organisations could implement structured tenure limits and role rotations to prevent prolonged exposure to distressing content. Studies suggest that regular breaks and role diversification can mitigate emotional exhaustion and reduce the risk of burnout. Fostering a workplace culture that values psychological wellbeing and openly supports mental health care is fundamental to ensuring that digital forensic investigators feel respected, understood, and adequately supported in their roles.
Conclusion
The mental health challenges facing digital forensic investigators are profound and complex. Long hours, combined with constant exposure to traumatic content, create conditions ripe for burnout, PTSD, and compassion fatigue. Addressing these issues requires both enhanced mental health resources and a shift in organisational culture to break down the stigma around seeking support. By prioritising the wellbeing of digital forensic investigators, organisations can not only help protect the mental health of their staff but also ensure a more sustainable, effective workforce dedicated to protecting vulnerable individuals.
A Message to All DFIs
Your dedication and skill as digital forensic investigators play a vital role in protecting society from unimaginable harm. The work you do demands not only technical expertise but also a deep reserve of strength, as you confront and process highly distressing material daily.
This message is a reminder that your mental well-being matters. The challenges of long hours, high caseloads, and exposure to graphic content can take a toll, leading to burnout, compassion fatigue, and even PTSD. These effects are not a reflection of weakness but a testament to the intensity and importance of your work. Please remember that it is okay to not feel okay. Seeking help is not a sign of fragility; it is a courageous step towards sustaining your strength and continuing to excel in your role. If you feel overwhelmed, reach out to a colleague, a trusted professional, or a friend. You are not alone, and there are people and resources ready to support you.
Your well-being is essential, not just for your personal health but also for the invaluable contributions you make to your field. Prioritise moments to rest and recharge and remember that asking for help is a sign of resilience, not surrender.
Thank you for the vital work you do. Take care of yourselves. You are appreciated more than you know. I dedicate this article to those who still practice in this field with respect and gratitude to you all.
Paul Gullon-Scott BSc MA MSc MSc FMBPSS is a former Digital Forensic Investigator with nearly 30 years of service at Northumbria Police in the UK, specializing in child abuse cases. As a recognized expert on the mental health impacts of digital forensic work, Paul now works as a Higher Assistant Psychologist at Roseberry Park Hospital in Middlesbrough and is the developer of a pioneering well-being framework to support digital forensics investigators facing job-related stress. He recently published the research paper “UK-based Digital Forensic Investigators and the Impact of Exposure to Traumatic Material” and has chosen to collaborate with Forensic Focus in order to raise awareness of the mental health effects associated with digital forensics. Paul can be contacted in confidence via LinkedIn.
Bibliography
Brady, P. Q. (2017). Crimes Against Caring: Exploring the Risk of Secondary Traumatic Stress, Burnout, and Compassion Satisfaction Among Child Exploitation Investigators. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 32(4), 305–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-016-9223-8
Burruss, G. W., Holt, T. J., & Wall-Parker, A. (2018). The Hazards of Investigating Internet Crimes Against Children: Digital Evidence Handlers’ Experiences with Vicarious Trauma and Coping Behaviors. In American Journal of Criminal Justice (Vol. 43, Issue 3, pp. 433–447). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-017-9417-3
Denk-Florea, C.-B., Gancz, B., Gomoiu, A., Ingram, M., Moreton, R., & Pollick, F. (2020). Understanding and supporting law enforcement professionals working with distressing material: Findings from a qualitative study. (Vol. 15). Public Library of Science. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242808
Duran, F., & Woodhams, J. (2022). Impact of Traumatic Material on Professionals in Analytical and Secondary Investigative Roles Working in Criminal Justice Settings: A Qualitative Approach. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 37(4), 904–917. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-022-09532-8
Kelty, S. F., McQueen, E., Pymont, C., & Green, N. (2021). Avoiding Burnout at the Digital Forensics Coalface: Targeted strategies for forensic agencies in the management of job-related stress. Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, 38, 301127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsidi.2021.301127
Krause, M. (2009). Identifying and Managing Stress in Child Pornography and Child Exploitation Investigators (Vol. 24, pp. 22–29). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-008-9033-8
Lillis, D., Becker, B., O’Sullivan, T., & Scanlon, M. (2016). Current Challenges and Future Research Areas for Digital Forensic Investigation. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1604.03850
Maceachern, A. D., Jindal-Snape, D., & Jackson, S. (2011). Child Abuse Investigation: Police Officers and Secondary Traumatic Stress. In International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics (Vol. 17, Issue 4, pp. 329–339). https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2011.11076898
Powell, M., Cassematis, P., Benson, M., Smallbone, S., & Wortley, R. (2014). Police officers’ strategies for coping with the stress of investigating Internet child exploitation. In Traumatology: An International Journal (Vol. 20, Issue 1, pp. 32–42). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0099378
Redmond, T., Conway, P., Bailey, S., Lee, P., & Lundrigan, S. (2023). How we can protect the protectors: Learning from police officers and staff involved in child sexual abuse and exploitation investigations (Vol. 14).
Seigfried-Spellar, K. C. (2018). Assessing the Psychological Well-being and Coping Mechanisms of Law Enforcement Investigators vs. Digital Forensic Examiners of Child Pornography Investigations. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 33(3), 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-017-9248-7
Slack, D. P. (2020). Trauma and coping mechanisms exhibited by forensic science practitioners: A literature review (Vol. 2, pp. 310–316). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.10.001
Strickland, C., Kloess, J. A., & Larkin, M. (2023). An exploration of the personal experiences of digital forensics analysts who work with child sexual abuse material on a daily basis: “You cannot unsee the darker side of life”. In Frontiers in Psychology (Vol. 14). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1142106
Strickland, C. R. (2022). Understanding the impact of digital forensic analysts’ experiences of working with online child sexual exploitation and abuse [Foren.Clin.Psy.D]. https://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/13174/
Tehrani, N. (2016). Extraversion, neuroticism and secondary trauma in Internet child abuse investigators. Occupational Medicine, 66(5), 403–407. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqw004
Tehrani, N. (2018). Psychological well-being and workability in child abuse investigators. In Occupational Medicine (Vol. 68, Issue 3, pp. 165–170). https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqy016
Wilson-Kovacs, D., Rappert, B., & Redfern, L. (2021). Dirty Work? Policing Online Indecency in Digital Forensics. In The British Journal of Criminology (Vol. 62, Issue 1, pp. 106–123). https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azab055
